Iago (September) Discussion

[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]


Re: A trial quote - about O.J. reading this

From: Jasper
Date: 9/12/04
Time: 11:05:17 PM
Remote Name: 69.212.208.55

Comments

Lollie,

WELCOME BACK! I was worried about you. If Buster and Ludwig hadn’t kept us going we’d be dead in the water.

My old friend Pat Whetham hasn’t checked in for a long time for a very good reason but I talked to her recently on the phone and she is with us in spirit. I’m still worried about Jean (the hurricane) and I wish Miss. Marple would drop us a note to let us know that she is O.K. I haven’t heard as much from Charlie or Kari as I’d like but I respect the fact they have other things to do. I would also love to hear from the people who started posting before the boards went down for so long. They were terrific. And Charlotte – where are you?

I keep looking for Pat Valentino to pop in and share his wisdom with us. His long letter is the one that contains most of the points that we’ve discussed on the Iago board. I put it in the Knowledge Base for immediate access. He is a friend of Joe Bosco and Donald Freed. He put me in contact with Donald Freed just as Charlie put me in contact with Chris (Sven) Springer and Charlotte hooked me up with Dr. Johnson.

Lollie, you don’t give yourself enough credit. I admire your smarts and your courage. I appreciate your kindness and I have faith in you to do the right thing. OF COURSE I want you to contact Dr. Johnson. He is the key to turning everything around with O.J. who is pursing Johnson’s theories that Nicole was alive after 11:00, there were two active killers and Ron Goldman punched one of them in the mouth. None of this helps O.J. and it lets Fuhrman completely off the hook.

My findings are consistent with Johnson’s expert interpretation of the autopsy findings (two knives, long knife in right hand short knife in left/Ron attacked first). They not consistent with his non-medical interpretations of what his findings mean with respect to the number of active killers involved in the murders. His medical expertise was crucial to my findings. My military expertise (one killer/classic military ambush) should mean something to his reconsideration of his non-medical findings. If he can be persuaded to look at the evidence against Fuhrman, I know that O.J. will be in a much better position to defend himself. I believe that Fuhrman will be tried for murder and the credit will go to Dr. Johnson, as it should for the guts it will take for him admit that he was wrong. --Jasper.


Last changed: September 12, 2004