[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Ludwig
Date: 9/12/04
Time: 3:01:22 PM
Remote Name: 212.23.107.191
A one-time mentioning of the idea in a TV-interview surely won't work. They will maybe ask MF about his screwed up alibi for the murder night. But what will he do? FOR SURE he'll have an answer (after years of time to prepare for this question) for all of us! He'll say he misunderstood Marcia Clarks question about the time of the murders and it surprised him so much to be asked about the time of the murders that he confused BEGIN at the barbecue with RETURNING from the barbecue. And after that - it'll be CASE CLOSED again...
What would work can only be something permanent, just as permanent as his opponents:
- an own homepage with 101 reasons why MF is guilty of murder (didn't find an official O.J. homepage yet, only www.askoj.com from an q/a-event in 2000, with a video "Thoughts on Fuhrman")
- After having heard the opinion from just about everybody, the media *is* still waiting what Ito would have to say. Imaging a major newpaper frontpage article "JUDGE ITO THINKS FUHRMAN IS THE MURDERER" - that would get MF into big enough trouble, for sure.
- O.J. should be able to stage a televised statement, shouldn't he. Just like his suicide note back then. But that's rather unrealistic of course, since he'll not do that unless really being ABSOLUTELY convinced MF did it.
I wonder if MF was "Nicole's cop", should O.J. not have known Fuhrman quite well? In connection with the Wasz-hitman story they always claimes O.J. might know the murderer but doesn't want the truth to come out because it would expose something embarrassing/illegal that he did. If O.J. knows about MF's airfilled, but doesn't tell, i think he HAS something to hide.